4. Next Steps |
|||
|
9 th |
10 th |
11 th |
4.1 |
Evaluate product and process: Students will reflect on the research process and the final product. |
||
4.1.a |
Evaluate the product and process according to pre-determined criteria (e.g. rubric). |
||
Teacher |
Provide a checklist, rubric, journal or other tool, for students to self-monitor their progress during the course of the assignment. (T) |
Provide a checklist, rubric, journal or other tool, for students to self-monitor their progress during the course of the assignment. (T) |
Review and incorporate multiple techniques for reading non-fiction as needed. (T) |
Student |
Use a teacher created method for self-evaluation (e.g. checklist, journal, teacher conference, rubric) to self monitor the research process. |
Use a teacher created method for self-evaluation (e.g. checklist, journal, teacher conference, rubric) to self monitor the research process with some independence. |
Use multiple strategies for reading information with guidance. |
| 4.1 b | Use evaluative questions during the research process to evaluate the quality of the research process. For example: Do I have enough target information to answer my question? Am I missing information that would help me give a more complete answer? Are my research questions focused and specific? | ||
Teacher |
Model how to use meta-cognitive techniques to monitor progress during the research process. (T/L) |
Model how to use meta-cognitive techniques to monitor progress during the research process. (T/L) |
Review and incorporate multiple techniques for analyzing non-fiction sources as needed. (T) |
Student |
Use basic metacognitive techniques to monitor progress during the research process. | Use basic metacognitive techniques to monitor progress during the research process. | Use multiple strategies for analyzing information sources with guidance. |
|
|||
4.2 |
Create future learning goals: Students will consider self reflection and classroom feedback to adjust strategies for future research. |
||
4.2 a |
Reflect on the product and the research process to determine strengths and weaknesses using evaluative questions and journals, checklists, or other methods. |
||
Teacher |
Use peer evaluation; provide a rubric or other technique for students to self-evaluate their product. (T) |
Use peer evaluation; provide a rubric or other technique for students to self-evaluate their product. (T) |
Provide a checklist, rubric, journal or other tool, for students to self-monitor their progress during the course of the assignment. |
Student |
Use a teacher created method for self-evaluation (e.g. checklist, journal, teacher conference or rubric) after completing the research process with guidance. |
Use a teacher created method for self-evaluation (e.g. checklist, journal, teacher conference or rubric) after completing the research process with guidance. |
Use a teacher created method for self-evaluation (e.g. checklist, journal, teacher conference, and rubric) to self monitor the research process with some independence. |
|
|||
4.2 b |
Create a plan for learning or reviewing new skills. For example, a student might seek help from the teacher when selecting or identifying appropriate keywords. |
||
Teacher |
Use reflective journals, class discussion, or other techniques to help student identify strength/weaknesses and set goals to improve their reading, research and composition skills. (T) |
Use reflective journals, class discussion, or other techniques to help student identify strength/weaknesses and set goals to improve their reading, research and composition skills. (T) |
Review meta-cognitive techniques to monitor progress during the research process. (T/L) |
Student |
Reflect on strengths/weaknesses and participate in goal setting with a teacher guided exercise. | Reflect on strengths/weaknesses and participate in goal setting with a teacher guided exercise. | Use basic metacognitive techniques to monitor progress during the research process. |